July ‘09 - Lyrics part 2
July 28th, 2009I guess the point of any debate about song lyrics is put into perfect perspective by a comment that constantly passes between my producer, Garrett Soden, and myself. “What’s the reason for this song? Why does it exist?”
Meaning, does the song say or offer anything new, worthwhile, insightful or inspirational? Or is it simply self-indulgence? (Or in its nadir, essentially not much beyond gibberish.)
Anyone can put words together without craft or thoughtful over-arching design — we do it all the time in casual conversation. Indeed, the difference between inconsequential banality on the one side, and wit and insight on the other, is largely a product of forethought, and to a lesser degree, practice.
A comon argument concerning song lyrics is to differentiate them from poetry — song lyrics, it is strongly asserted — are to be sung, not read. While there is, of course, some merit to the contention, in the end blind subscription to that idea has led us to license a continuing decline in the quality of song lyrics. In fact, when a song is so obtuse as to be pretty much indecipherable, the defense usually thrown up is that, well, these lyrics are SUPPOSED to be equivocal and/or obscure — in this case the lyrics ARE poetry after all!… (This begs discussion on the accessibility of poetic language and writing generally: are poems which are easily understood less poetic? I think not — but there are entire libraries, English departments and careers founded on the need for analysis, decryption and “explanation” of poetry. Poems that are more quickly grasped — or, more pointedly, even comedic — don’t require such intermediation; if all poems were written by Billy Collins, known for his wit and accessibility, the need for academic parsing would be rare indeed….)
To my thinking, a song SHOULD, in most cases, be readable — be able to stand even without the complicity, assistance and benificence of the accompanying music. I hope my lyrics, even in cases where a specific reference may be obscure to a specific reader or listener, attain both resonance and insight — and if the song is obviously meant simply to entertain, actual craft.
Songs, like poems, can illuminate. And we can also infer meaning that can be substantiated — avoiding the intentionalist fallacy that what is elicited MUST be proven to be the creator’s actual intent – but such inference should reasonably be expected to derive from the actual composition, not just what we “wish” it was telling us.
In contemporary popular music, all too often the reader and listener is essentially expected to PROVIDE context, message and resolve from what is in fact little other than self-indulgent blather, or the haphazard throwing of words against the wall, hoping something sticks. Come up with a catchy guitar riff, hang a gaggle of words on it — and have a cute and manicured girl or boy sing them, with feeling….
A song should have a reason to exist, be that reason mundane or profound, comic or journalistic. If it doesn’t, frankly, why bother?….